Deleted because of the "fuck off"?

about 2

Oh and by the way: http://www.examiner.com/x-25061-Climate-Change-Examiner~y2009m11d20-ClimateGate--Climate-centers-server-hacked-revealing-documents-and-emails

http://www.filedropper.com/foi2009

HOLY FUCKING SHIT. Honestly I have no words. If this is true, it's the biggest scam in science ever, and I'm not even kidding. I mean, GOD! Jesus fucking christ!

>>6182

So, you an absolute total idiot, right!

>>6183
Did you actually look at the links? I'm sure it's easy to dismiss if you didn't, but really... I guess I'll have to wait untill it's on the big news tomorrow to be taken seriously. Also lol posting from mobile. This took me like 10 min to post this.

>>6058
>logically consistent
Another invention of humans.

Yes, OP, there is a limit to how much an individual of the species Homo Sapiens can understand.

Fortunately, that's not a problem.

>>6178
So what?

go read "Rant" by chuck palaniuak.

or
rant tl;dr

Kid gets bitten by a black widow spider, doesn't die, so he intentionally gets bitten by insects and animals. Because of this, he has rabbies ALL THE FUCKING TIME. As soon as he gets his rabbies cured, he just goes and contracts it again. Because of this he somehow nurtures a SUPER RABIES. He then moves to the city, shares drinks at partys yada yada yada

nanobots.

bibles?

>>6139 Nice idea!

use lense to melt metal in a pot. use tongs to lift pot and pour metal into a rough sand/clay/plaster mold of something you want. beat off casting material with a hammer/mallet and finish off object with a file.

>>6173

You're not going to get anything NEAR hot enough to melt most metal. That kind of fresnel lens will only heat something up to maybe 2-300 degrees F.

>>>/lit/6681

Here ya go man.

Hey, OP. No need to thank us.

Thanks, everyone.

>>6065
What would happen if you fire a portal on another portal that is not connected to another portal?

1. Fusion.
2. Quantum computing.
3. Food production.
4. Space travel/exploration/settlement.

1. SPASE
2. Portals
3. How to inflict bodily harm through the interbutts
4. The perfect brew
5. Dakka dakka dakka etc.

If you're reductivist, yes, we don't know "why" gravity works--you can talk about how it warps space-time, but what causes THAT?

But why would you be that reductivist? If you get down far enough, something HAS to work "just because". We don't know "why" the other forces work any more than we know "why" gravity works, or anything else. Stop being retarded.

>>6167
>
But why would you be that reductivist? If you get down far enough, something HAS to work "just because". We don't know "why" the other forces work any more than we know "why" gravity works, or anything else. Stop being retarded.

That kind of thinking is severely detrimental to the very nature of science.

>>6168

I don't mean that one should behave as though there is a limit (and just stop looking at a certain point)--I mean that there IS a boundary. Maybe we'll discover that mass is actually some property of space or something, and we'll get more reductivist view; we should always be on the look-out for something like that. But it's not fair to cast aspersions on something just because it's not "complete", since it's logically impossible for a theory to be complete.