http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4dPjp3oEb0

psychohistory.org
fringeelements.ning.com
nostate.com
wired.com
slate.com

Pretty sure hypothesises have evidence too bro. "A hypotheses is a proposed explanation for an observable phenomenon."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothesis

>>1101
Your point?

wait, isn't one of the three threads currently stickied on this board for general conspiracy knowledge? Man, we really need to get our shit together here on /foilhat/

I know when I started looking into this I watched a lot of David Icke videos and worked my way down from there to more reasonable theories. Plenty of shit available on google video.

>>1102

I find the theory that women are secretly controlling the world laughable because women are still not equal to men in many ways. There are more men in power in the government, by far. For example. Also, a major form of entertainment is organized sports, but can you tell me the last time you watched a professional women's sport?

Goddamn. That stuff about killing women and children is rough.

>When you're older you'll understand these things...

I wonder what old Captain Hook means? Would she be groomed into "knowledge" of the agenda?

>>842
>Johnson City fag reporting in.
I hope you appreciate the irony of this statement.
Highest gay population, and rate of AIDS in the area.

>>843
Well played, sir, well played.

Born in TN.,raised in Oak Ridge ( I still glow in the dark).And yes,those people are nuts.I left.

>>872 JFK was killed because he murdered Marylin Monroe. You don't off a piece of ass like that and expect to get away with it.

Of course Oswald killed Kennedy #1. Why else would he kill some random cop just because he saw him on the street? But he sure didn't work alone.

Not only did FDR want him out of the way with his obsession to be president. The CIA & FBI as well. Kennedy hated their existence and wanted to pull the plug on both organizations entirely. He is quoted directly stating his passion for this. Hundreds of people in the federal government had reasons to off Kennedy.

Either Oswald was contracted by the CIA or had him under constant surveillance and discovered his intentions (The former being more realistic in my opinion. Oswald wanted to be remembered). They even had three "seconds" waiting close by just in case he couldn't go through with it. These three "vagrants" who were picked up by the police shortly after the assassination, were not identified at the time. But much later on were identified by a one of their own in his last will and testament. All the images match up perfectly to their CIA counterparts. I seriously doubt that this man, who had a long history for being truthful and no-nonsense lied with his last wishes, his relationship with the CIA is confirmed and isn't an issue.

What about Jack Ruby? A friend of his who was literally standing right next to him on that fateful day Oswald was silenced. Stated Mr. Ruby was completely calm, cool, and collected until the precise moment Oswald entered the room. He said Mr. Ruby in-laymans-terms without warning just freaked out and started repeating "he killed the president, he killed my president." or something to that effect. The circumstances of this the friend also testified to be very suspicions, as if Ruby was putting on a bad vaudeville act to cover his real motives.

Ruby had many contacts in the CIA & FBI for his little-known services rendered as a stool-pigeon. My gut feeling is he was contracted to silence Oswald lest he spill the beans on the whole plot. Remember how Oswald get saying "I'm just a patsy..." ?

You could also say that Ruby was silenced in a way...

" FDR "?.LBJ maybe.

>>1090
Or to shift the goals/intent by carrying out implementations contrary to the supposed ideals. Watering down the effectiveness by infiltration and poor performance. Teens embracing the shallowest of the group's messages/appearance and turning it fashionable.

Or really, any of the other ways in which a certain similar group model has been degraded.

>>805 I don't come here much, despite being an original lobbier for /foilhat/... but in all likelyhood, Bin Laden is dead in a cave somewhere.

BIN LADEN IS either dead, or living the high life hidden by his rich family. I couldn't say which.

Crap, I have the Al Quaeda terrorist manual, but I'm not at my computer.
Will upload later.

OP here, Im not sure if the imbed is working so here's links

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSrIkUXwsNk

this one goes into more depth

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDqh-r8TQgs

wikipedia stuff on it

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experiments_in_the_Revival_of_Organisms

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergei_S._Bryukhonenko

and this video was made in 1940, so no people older than that :)

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

Dude, plant a lemon tree and an orange tree.

One good sized lemon and one large orange, 1.8 liters of water (Distilled, if you're paranoid) along with sugar to taste (normally one tablespoon if the fruit is nice and sweet) will make two liters of the most ballza juice drink you've ever had.

Since the water and the fruit is free, you're only really paying for the sugar, so that makes the juice cost around 3 cents a liter. Lucky for me, I live in a neighborhood where almost everyone has a lemon tree, and you can get bags and bags of them for free. You could even make your own concentrate and freeze it for the off-season months.

And if you're paranoid about the refined and processed sugar, plant some sugar cane. It won't always grow as big as it does on farms, but most areas will allow you to produce a decent sized stalk. Using it is easy too, since you can just cut a stalk down, chop it into one inch segments, and grind it up in a blender or just shave it into thin strips with a potato peeler and put these into your drink.

>>1073

denaturation causes proteins to return to primary conformation, resulting in easier digestion. Tertiary and quaternary-conformation proteins, on the other hand, are much harder to break down. This is why eggs/peanut butter goes right through you while meat takes a bit longer.

>>1087
Not always. Denaturing via various means can have a complex and assorted outcome to the proteins involved. Although some proteins become easier to break down when denatured via chemical modification, all animal proteins denatured by heating/cooking lose any enzymes of value and become more difficult to digest. This even goes for pasteurizing of cow's milk, not that it's designed to digest well in its native raw state to begin with in a critter with only one stomach... the pasteurization only makes it harder to digest. Harder to digest=longer to digest=undigested protein in the intestines=rotting proteins releasing toxins into the body.

It doesn't matter if you subscribe to the evolution model or the divine creation model, something that can be agreed upon by both camps is that excluding parasitic and diseased food sources, all critters do better with raw food over cooked, and one only has to look at the overall health of a dog fed Alpo versus raw meat to see it. We as humans cook by nature fundamentally to make foods that we shouldn't eat and would normally make us sick or fail to nourish us, edible. Denaturing proteins are not always a good thing... it's a necessary task under certain situations with certain sources of modern animal protein, but when health concerns are not a concern, it should be avoided if possible.