>>922

Before you do, figure out how you're going to edit it. Unless a college near you will let you use their table splicer, you're fucked.

I saw Dude Where's my Car because Roger Ebert gave it a thumbs up.

>>1620
That's because Ebert rates movies for what they are. If it's a drama for certain fans he rates it accordingly. In that case it was a pot smoking comedy for teenagers and douches that served it's purpose.

>>1620>>859
I know that joke must have seemed hilarious when you thought it up, but it's quite impossible, since Roger Ebert never reviewed "Dude, Where's My Car?"

>>1640
I think his criterion is basically that if a movie does what it set out to do, and it does it well, then it's a good movie. That's why he 2.5-3 stars for movies like "The Last House on the Left." His criteria for 4 stars/2 thumbs up requires a little more than that. I don't always agree with him, and think he is suckered in too easily now and then, but his reviews are more thoughtful and well-written than nearly any living critic.

>>1646
Oh yeah, I remember now. Thanks very much for the reminder actually, that's exactly what I feel like watching now.

>>1658
Holy fuck, I can't believe I forgot those! And yeah, great, great films. The Spanish is very good but I actually prefer the American premise. Other than that, almost frame for frame the same film but excellent. The sound editing or whatever it's correct term is on the American one too is awesome.

>>1582
>>1590
>>1607

28 DAYS/WEEKS LATER DOES NOT CONTAIN ZOMBIES, ULTIMATE FAIL ON YOUR PART. HOW DO YOU SLEEP AT NIGHT?

It is a fucking great film though (days, not weeks, weeks is shit)

>>1664
I knew there would be some tightassed guy going "those are not zombies!!!111 hurr durrr"
this is why we can't have nice things

>>1633

it wasn't mentioned because it's not what the op asked for.
The Truman show was about truman discovering his life was a lie and a TV show.
The op is asking for a shower where the actual movie you're watching is his life.

OP's idea sounds cash.

if I were directing this I'd have extras start punching the protagonist in the face as he's realizing that he's stuck in a movie. then maybe throw him out of a plane at the end.

We are the Strange

I'm a Cyborg But That's OK was awesome and very, very kind.

Solaris
...or pretty much any Tarkovski film.

Soderbergh's Solaris with George Clooney (not a remake but based on the same novel by Stanisław Lem) is also pretty ok.

  If you want a good insanity movie try "Calvaire"

>>1581
Pistol guy? You mean Moriarty?

ARE YOU GUYS SERIOUS!!!!!!!!!

THIS FILM WAS SO FREAKING BAD!

2 demensional character's, plot and bad guy.

gah!

(USER WAS OXYCLEANED FOR THIS POST )

I'm something of a Holmes fanboy and I expected this is be utter shit.
I also read some crap about Holmes and Watson being raging homosexuals in the film from some fucking fangirls and was even more enraged.

Then, I watched it and thoroughly enjoyed every minute of it.
It was quite excellent actually. I certainly hope they make another one.
It did a proper job of modernizing Holmes without bastardizing it.

Ben Affleck as Han Solo

Peter O'Toole as Obi Wan Kenobi

Casey Affleck as Luke Skywalker (There's no one who looks more like him and you know it!)

George Clooney as Red Leader

Jeffrey Dean Morgan as Biggs

Shia Labeouf can play Wedge Antilles

There is only one Han Solo, and he always shoots first.

>>1579
Gotta say for a second I thought that fucking Lucas was actually going to remake the star wars trilogy.